ScholarMate
客服热线:400-1616-289

Efficacy of acupuncture for cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu, Yunlan; Ren, Mengjuan; Kuang, Zhuoran; Luo, Xufei; Li, Huishan; Zhang, Yikai; Wen, Wanxin; Cai, Yefeng; Ni, Xiaojia*; Chen, Yaolong*
Science Citation Index Expanded
广东省人民医院; 广州中医药大学; 兰州大学; 中国医学科学院

摘要

Background: Cerebral resuscitation is one of the main therapeutic aims in the treatment of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who experience a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, the therapeutic effects of current treatments are not ideal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neurological function of acupuncture combined with conventional cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitationthe (CPCR) for patients after ROSC.Methods: Seven electronic databases and other related websites were searched to identify studies on acupuncture combined with conventional CPCR for patients after ROSC. R software was used to conduct a meta-analysis, and the outcomes that could not be pooled were analyzed using a descriptive analysis.Results: Seven RCTs involving 411 participants who had experienced ROSC were eligible for inclusion. The main acupoints were Neiguan (PC6), Shuigou (DU26), Baihui (DU20), Yongquan (KI1), and Sanyinjiao (SP6). Compared to conventional CPCR, acupuncture combined with conventional CPCR led to signifi-cantly higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores on day 3 (mean difference (MD) = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.35, I2 = 0%), day 5 (MD = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.27, 2.15; I2 = 0%), and day 7 (MD = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.50; I2 = 0%).Conclusion: Acupuncture-assisted conventional CPCR may have a potential role in improving neurologi-cal function in CA patients after ROSC, but the certainty of evidence is very low and more high-quality studies are required. Protocol registration: This review was registered at the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42021262262.

关键词

Acupuncture Cardiac arrest Cerebral resuscitation Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis