摘要
We consider the principal (shareholders)-agent (manager) problem in connection with investment and CEO compensation under two types of limited commitment, where the principal worries about model uncertainty and exhibits ambiguity-averse with respect to the true probability. Consistent with maxmin criterion, a robust principal makes decisions under some endogenous worst case. In the case of limited commitment on the manager side, the firm invests less and average q and marginal q are always lowered in the presence of ambiguity. However, in the case of limited commitment on the shareholder side, ambiguity induces under-investment and over-investment simultaneously and has different implications for average q and marginal q. Moreover, the robust compensation contract features time-varying compensation no matter whether the limited commitment constraints bind or not, which is contrary to the conventional wisdom. Finally, the optimal sensitivity of continuation utility increases with ambiguity-aversion.
-
单位上海大学