Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial

作者：Huang, Changming; Liu, Hao; Hu, Yanfeng; Sun, Yihong; Su, Xiangqian; Cao, Hui; Hu, Jiankun; Wang, Kuan; Suo, Jian; Tao, Kaixiong; He, Xianli; Wei, Hongbo; Ying, Mingang; Hu, Weiguo; Du, Xiaohui; Yu, Jiang; Zheng, Chaohui; Liu, Fenglin; Li, Ziyu; Zhao, Gang; Zhang, Jiachen; Chen, Pingyan; Li, Guoxin^*

来源：JAMA Surgery, 2022, 157(1): 9-17.

DOI：10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5104

• DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL
• LONG-TERM OUTCOMES
• ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY
• D2 GASTRECTOMY
• UNITED-STATES
• SURGERY
• FEASIBILITY
• DISSECTION
• MORBIDITY
• MORTALITY

Importance It is not clear whether laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy produce similar outcomes among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Data from a multicenter, randomized clinical trial (Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgical Study [CLASS]-01) showed that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy did not result in inferior disease-free survival at 3 years compared with open distal gastrectomy. Objective To report 5-year overall survival data from the CLASS-01 trial of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients This was a noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 centers in China. A total of 1056 eligible patients with clinical stage T2, T3, or T4a gastric cancer without bulky nodes or distant metastases were enrolled from September 12, 2012, to December 3, 2014. Final follow-up was on December 31, 2019. Interventions Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio after stratification by site, age, cancer stage, and histologic features to undergo either laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (n = 528) or open distal gastrectomy (n = 528) with D2 lymphadenectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The 5-year overall survival rates were updated to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. In addition, per-protocol and as-treated analyses were performed for overall survival. Results Data from 1039 patients (726 men [69.9%]; mean [SD] age, 56.2 [10.7] years) who received curative therapy were analyzed. At 5 years, the overall survival rates were 72.6% in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group and 76.3% in the open distal gastrectomy group (log-rank P = .19; hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93-1.48; P = .19). After comparison for competing risk events, gastric cancer-related deaths (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87-1.49; P = .34) and deaths from other causes (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.74-2.05; P = .42) did not differ significantly between groups. Overall rates of survival did not differ significantly between groups with each tumor stage. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized institutions resulted in similar 5-year overall survival compared with open distal gastrectomy among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. @@@ This randomized clinical trial reports 5-year overall survival data from the CLASS-01 trial of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. @@@ Question Does laparoscopic distal gastrectomy yield similar 5-year overall survival to open distal gastrectomy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 1056 patients with clinically staged, locally advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 73% vs 76% for open distal gastrectomy, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Meaning The finding provides further evidence for the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients assessed preoperatively as having locally advanced cancer.

• 单位
  复旦大学; 上海交通大学; 中山大学; 哈尔滨医科大学; 北京大学; 南方医科大学; 四川大学; 中国人民解放军第四军医大学; 华中科技大学; 1; 吉林大学